8 Having an understanding of the process and structure used to produce a peer‐reviewed publication will surely improve the likelihood that a submitted manuscript will result in a successful publication.Ĭlear communication of the findings of research is essential to the growth and development of science 3 and professional practice. Furthermore, peer review manuscript publication systems requiring these technical writing skills can be developed and improved with practice. 5 However, the very process of writing can be a helpful tool for promoting the process of scientific thinking, 6, 7 and effective writing skills allow professionals to participate in broader scientific conversations. 3, 4 Barriers to effective writing include lack of experience, poor writing habits, writing anxiety, unfamiliarity with the requirements of scholarly writing, lack of confidence in writing ability, fear of failure, and resistance to feedback. The task of writing a scientific paper and submitting it to a journal for publication is a time‐consuming and often daunting task. It is the rigor of this review process that makes scientific journals the primary source of new information that impacts clinical decision‐making and practice. Following this review the manuscript is recommended for publication, revision or rejection.
Most clinical and scientific discovery is published in peer‐reviewed journals, which are those that utilize a process by which an author's peers, or experts in the content area, evaluate the manuscript. In order for the results of research to be accessible to other professionals and have a potential effect on the greater scientific community, it must be written and published. “The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking”Ĭonducting scientific and clinical research is only the beginning of the scholarship of discovery.
0 kommentar(er)
